Your approach to your research problem — КиберПедия 

Биохимия спиртового брожения: Основу технологии получения пива составляет спиртовое брожение, - при котором сахар превращается...

Адаптации растений и животных к жизни в горах: Большое значение для жизни организмов в горах имеют степень расчленения, крутизна и экспозиционные различия склонов...

Your approach to your research problem

2022-12-30 25
Your approach to your research problem 0.00 из 5.00 0 оценок
Заказать работу

Comments

In this exercise we would like you to describe your own possible approach to your research problem along the lines suggested in the previous steps. You should start by considering whether you will approach your problem deductively or inductively. You should then attempt to answer the relevant questions below. This will give you a list of criteria for your proposal.

In the next step we introduce some planning tools you may find useful in this exercise.

Inductive approach

What we know, what we don’t know Impact Recommendations for practice
Who are the major stakeholders in this problem? - What is the nature of their involvement? - In what settings is this problem particularly prevalent? - What is the historical background to its emergence? What sort of a problem is this? - Do the stakeholders appear to have an adequate understanding of the problem? - If they do, why haven’t they been able to solve it? - If they don’t, then what do you think is actually the nature of the problem? What happens if this problem is framed in different ways? - What appears to be the ‘best’ framing? - How do I decide what ‘best’ means here? - What kinds of literature does each framing connect to? Who might be the audience for my research? - Which academic communities would be interested in what I am doing? - Can I meet the standards for evidence and debate in that community? What are the audiences outside a university context? - How can I reach these audiences? - What kind of language will I need to speak? - What will they find useful in what I do? How can I assist in improving practice? - What kinds of change would I like to see brought about? - Who would benefit from these changes (and who might lose out)? - How would I benefit from those changes?

Deductive approach

What we know, what we don’t know Impact Recommendations for practice
What is missing from existing studies? - What problems have yet to be addressed by the current approach? - What are the gaps in the existing literature? How can the theoretical approach be tested in a new way? - Can the theory be extended to other kinds of problems than the ones studied already? - What aspects of the theory might be revised or critiqued? Are there any controversies or unsettled debates within the literature to which I might contribute? - Are these debates conceptual, technical, methodological or empirical? What kind of research might provide evidence for one or other side or even ‘the answer’ to the debate? Who might be the audience for my research? - Which academic communities would be interested in what I am doing? - Can I meet the standards for evidence and debate in that community? What are the audiences outside a university context? - How can I reach these audiences? - What kind of language will I need to speak? - What will they find useful in what I do? How can I assist in improving practice? - What kinds of change would I like to see brought about? - Who would benefit from these changes (and who might lose out)? - How would I benefit from those changes?

 

 

MICHAEL ELUYEFA

Follow

09 SEP

I think a mixture of both will produce a more reliable result

 Like1 Like 1

 Reply

 Bookmark

 Flag

DN

DIMBELET C NGUEMET

Follow

09 SEP

Deductive looks easier to me

 Like2 Likes 2

 Reply

 Bookmark

 Flag

Luz Angeline Ortiz

Luz Angeline Ortiz

Follow

08 SEP

Based on this exercise, I feel my research will be inductive. However, when analyzing and attempting to answer the questions under deductive, I see cross-connectivity. I see how it can easily be a combination of both, even though I think it will predominantly fall more toward inductive research.

 Like1 Like 1

 Reply

 Bookmark

 Flag

Clare Flanagan

Clare Flanagan

Follow

08 SEP

I'm struggling a bit with this one! In reality, wouldn't we use both approaches at some point in our research?

 Like2 Likes 2

 Reply

 Bookmark

 Flag

MA

Mustafa Al lawati

Follow

07 SEP

My research is definitely a deductive approach style. The problem is there clearly defined and qualitatively evaluated, I’m planning to evaluate it quantitatively moreover I’m planning to use the tool in a different field.

 Like1 Like 1

 Reply

 Bookmark

 Flag

FN

Faruk Kwansah Nyame

Follow

06 SEP

The nature of my proposed studies falls under the inductive approach

 Like1 Like 1

 Reply

 Bookmark

 Flag

BC

Bill Cave

Follow

06 SEP

My proposed research problem would definitely require a deductive approach, as defined above. I am seeking to investigate an area which is radically under-researched using a methodology which has not previously been applied.

2.7


Поделиться с друзьями:

Общие условия выбора системы дренажа: Система дренажа выбирается в зависимости от характера защищаемого...

Поперечные профили набережных и береговой полосы: На городских территориях берегоукрепление проектируют с учетом технических и экономических требований, но особое значение придают эстетическим...

Опора деревянной одностоечной и способы укрепление угловых опор: Опоры ВЛ - конструкции, предназначен­ные для поддерживания проводов на необходимой высоте над землей, водой...

Механическое удерживание земляных масс: Механическое удерживание земляных масс на склоне обеспечивают контрфорсными сооружениями различных конструкций...



© cyberpedia.su 2017-2024 - Не является автором материалов. Исключительное право сохранено за автором текста.
Если вы не хотите, чтобы данный материал был у нас на сайте, перейдите по ссылке: Нарушение авторских прав. Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

0.011 с.