Text 37: a new start for Europe?

In the American view, Europe suffers from an overgenerous welfare state and an obsession with job security. Companies face too many regulations and too many taxes. The unemployed is paid too well for staying idle. Naturally, joblessness is high. It's 10 percent in Germany, 12 percent in Spain. But a case can be made that Europe's economy is on the verge of a revival that will shatter the American stereotype. The case, plausible though hardly preordained, deserves examination.

Let's start with the unmistakable signs of Europe's recovery. Its stock markets are buoyant. In 1997 the German market is up about 50 percent and the British 20 percent. Surveys of business confidence show big gains. Economist Thomas Mayer of Goldman Sachs in Frankfurt predicts that Europe's gross domestic product will increase 2.3 percent in 1997 and 2.6 percent in 1998, up from 1.7 percent in 1996.

But what really matters is whether the recovery is long enough - and strong enough - to reduce joblessness from the present 11 percent to, say, 6 or 7 percent. Europe's economy ought to be able to expand 3 to 4 percent annually for a number of years through lower unemployment and normal labour-force and productivity growth. But a sluggish expansion would barely affect unemployment. What haunts Europe is the fear that higher growth would trigger higher wages - and then higher interest rates to halt inflation. Can this stagflation be overcome?

Perhaps. One major country has already done it: Britain. Its unemployment has dropped from more than 10 percent in 1993 to less than 7 percent now, reports the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The simplest explanation is that Margaret Thatcher broke the unions. A deep recession in the early 1980s - meant to suppress high inflation - raised unemployment and bankrupted many unionized firms. New labour laws made strikes harder.

As job security and union power eroded, wage bargaining became more restrained. Wages no longer automatically rose with prices. Settlements varied more among companies. Workers had to consider that they might price themselves out of a job. "Things like plant productivity and the individual financial performance of companies became more important," says economist Douglas Godden of the Confederation of British Industry.

Something similar needs to happen in the rest of Europe. If workers never fear losing their jobs, there's little reason to restrain wages. Some uncertainty, anxiety and fear are essential. But of course, uncertainty, anxiety and fear are unpopular. The paradox is that the things governments do to minimize these scourges - legal job guarantees, higher minimum wages and various industry protections - weaken job creation. Unemployment drifts up because the young can't find work, and some industries shrink.

The central question for Europe is whether it can use its recovery to pare back self-defeating policies and practices. Let's imagine a virtuous circle. As the recovery accelerates, governments loosen protective policies precisely when their constituents need them less. Unemployment drops, sustaining the recovery and enabling the process to continue. Wages (and inflation) remain tame, because heightened job insecurity - the consequence of past unemployment -prompts wage restraint. In Germany, one poll found that the share of workers worried about their jobs rose from 29 to 42 percent between 1991 and 1995.

Granted, the odds against this are long. Countless politicians who have tinkered with the present system have been hurled from office. France's recent conservative government is the latest example. Even Thatcher's success was a bit of a fluke, says economist David Walton of Goldman Sachs in London. Her early policies were unpopular (unemployment was 12 percent in 1983). What reelected her in 1983 was the victory in the Falklands war the previous year. Finally, there's the stigma of seeming to ditch the "European economic model" for the allegedly cruel "Anglo-Saxon model".

But the odds are not impossible. The debate over rival models is artificial, because the differences are exaggerated. Each mixes government protections and market forces. Even many Europeans see their mix as too protective. Among economists, there's growing disillusionment. Companies are increasingly hostile and more willing to resort to layoffs. The common European currency would require more flexibility to adapt to new competitive conditions. Timing is everything in politics, and an improving economy and a shifting intellectual climate create an opportunity. It gives Europeans a chance for renewal. If they miss it, they can blame only themselves.

Список использованной литературы

1) Карачарова Н.Н., Масленникова А.А. Английский язык: Учебник для гуманитарных факультетов. – М., 1997.

2) Миловидов В. Английский язык для специалистов по финансовому менеджменту и банковскому делу. – Тверь, 1994.

3) Глушенкова Е.В. Английский язык для студентов экономических специальностей: Учебник / Е.В. Глушенкова, Е.Н. Комарова. – М.: ООО «Издательство АСТ»: ООО «Издательство Астрель», 2002.

4) Закоморная Е.А., Яшина С.Л. Английский для экономистов. Учебное пособие. Пособие по английскому языку для студентов экономических факультетов вузов. Моква: ИКЦ «МарТ», Ростов н/Д: Издательский центр «МарТ», 2003.

5) Шевелева С.А., Кокорина О.Б., Калиберзина И.А. Английский язык для банковских работников. Начальный курс. – М.: Издательство Института общего среднего образования РАО, 2001.

6) М.В. Скворцова. Английский язык для банковских работников: Специализированный курс, М.: Издательство Института общего среднего образования РАО, 2001.

7) СудовцевB.A. Учись читать литературу по специальности. M., 1985.

8) Янушкова T.П. Английский язык для студентов институтов культуры. Минск, 1988.

9) Hubbbard L.R. The Problems of Work: New Era Publications International Aps. Denmark, 1994.

10) Leana C.R., Feldman D.C. Coping with Job Loss. Macmilllan, Inc., New York, 1995.

11) Mayer J. Bringing jobs to people. International Labour Office, Geneva, 1988.

12) Serikova A.S. A basis for composition and précis writing. Moscoow, 1980.

13) Work in America: Report of Special Task Force to the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. U.S.A., 1975.

14) Агабекян И.П. Английский для экономистов / И.П. Агабекян, П.И. Коваленко. – Изд. 10-е, доп. и перераб. – Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 2008.