Re: Презумпции права (Великобритания)

by pitano1»Вс 20 янв 2013, 8:34

интересная статья.
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?m=201212

Вся судебная система является коммерческим мошенничеством. Под видом «преступления» Корона (прокурор) предъявляет обвинения Имени / трастовой учетной записи, а НЕ человеку, и создается конструктивное дело / трастовое дело. Только доверительные управляющие, имеющие законное право собственности на траст, могут получить доступ к трастовым фондам, но только с разрешения бенефициаров - нас, имеющих равноправный титул. Мы разрешаем только те платежи, которые производятся в нашу пользу. Максим Закона: «Тот, кто создает ответственность, должен предоставить средство правовой защиты». Это означает, что Корона несет ответственность за несанкционированные обвинения в адрес траста. Таким образом, Корона нарушает §336 CCC, Преступное злоупотребление доверием, а также §363, Получение ценных бумаг путем мошенничества.

Если машина правительства такова, что требует, чтобы вы совершали несправедливость по отношению к другому, тогда, я говорю, нарушите закон.
Генри Дэвид Торо
ЗАЩИЩЕНЫ ВСЕ НЕОБХОДИМЫЕ ПРАВА - AB INITIO - Без права регресса - Без допущения

питано1

Модератор

Канон 3228: Двенадцать Презумпций Суда

Presumptions of Law (UK)

Important Announcements and Forum Alerts

Post a reply

Top of Form

 

Bottom of Form

7 posts • Page 1 of 1

Presumptions of Law (UK)

by knowledgeispower-uk» Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:56 pm

Howdy all, its been a while! www.knowledgeispower-uk.tk - now has over 200 visitors per day, and we are inundated with emails for advice & guidance!
...so much so, we cant cope, as those of us who pull the site together all work full time for FIAT currency;) however, its currently getting updated, as & when.

Anyhow, I met with a Magistrate recently (drinks with my granddad and his pals, in their local village) anyway he has emailed me an internal document they use / refer to etc. which I thought could be of some use here. Its named 'The Presumptions of Law' i'll copy and paste for now, but if anybody wants the actual document, please send me a message via our site!

- - -

Presumptions of the law

A Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions
presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true.

There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public
Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government
as Executor/Beneficiary, Agent and Agency, Incompetence, and Guilt:

(i) The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Cours is a matter for the public
record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business
matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter
remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and

(ii) The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn
secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or public officials; by making additional
oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private "superior" oaths to their own Guild.
Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public
servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and

(iii) The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of "public officials"
who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartialty and
fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar
Guild members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such individuals
must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and

(iv) The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of "public officials" acting
as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal
claims of injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the
members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any
personal accountability for their actions; and

(v) The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court
is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually
invitation by summons. Unless the summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing
to visit or attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused and the existence of "guilt" stands; and

(vi) The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted stands and therefore one
who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody by "Custodians". Custodians
may only lawfully hold custody of property and "things" not flesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a thing and
property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians; and

(vii) The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a "resident" of a ward of a
local government area and have listed on your "passport" the letter P, you are a pauper and therefore under the
"Guardian" powers of the government and its agents as a "Court of Guardians". Unless this presumption is openly
challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court,
the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of
guardians (clerk of magistrates court);

(viii) The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume you accept the office of
trustee as a "public servant" and "government employee" just by attending a Roman Court, as such Courts are always for
public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman System. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state
you are merely visiting by "invitation" to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public trustee in
this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction - simply
because you "appeared"; and

(ix) The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is that for the matter at hand, the
Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of
Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter. if the accused does seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary
over their body, mind and soul they are acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a "false executor" challenging the "rightful"
judge as Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate assumes the role of "true" executor and has the right to have you
arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to
demonstrate you are both the true general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court,
questioning and challenging whether the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the presumption
stands and you are by default the trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate) or you are an
Executor De Son Tort and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek to assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to
assert their false claim against you; and

(x) The Presumption of Agent and Agency is the presumption that under agreement law you have expressed and granted
authority to the Judge and Magistrate through the statement of such words as "recognize, understand" or "comprehend"
and therefore agree to be bound to an agreement. Therefore, unless all presumptions of agent appointment are rebutted
through the use of such formal rejections as "I do not receognize you", to remove all implied or expressed appointment of
the judge, prosecutor or clerk as agents, the presumption stands and you agree to be contractually bound to perform at
the direction of the judge or magistrate; and

(xi) The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law, therefore incompetent
to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested,
detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you
know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it
stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you
obedient; and(xii) The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business meeting of
the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead "guilty", do not plead or plead "not guilty". Therefore unless you either
have previously prepared an affadavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call
a demurrer, then the presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to
guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from you.

- - -

We had a good chat about 'things' and he helped to open my eyes further...he's promised to send me more 'information' as and when he has time!

I particularly enjoyed reading: (vii) The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a "resident" of a ward of a
local government area and have listed on your "passport" the letter P, you are a pauper and therefore under the
"Guardian" powers of the government and its agents as a "Court of Guardians". Unless this presumption is openly
challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court,
the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of
guardians (clerk of magistrates court)

A pauper, and lunatic eh...CHEERS!

What they did in Hiroshima was terrorism, What they did in Fallujah was terrorism, Everyday USA - that is terrorism, Everyday UK - that is terrorism, Everyday...

www.knowledgeispower-uk.tk

knowledgeispower-uk

 

Posts: 59

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 9:59 am

Location: North East // England

· Website

Top