Bhagwati, J. Immiserizing Growth. A Geometrical Note, Review of Economic Studies XXV (3), No. 68, 1958.

138. Biersteker, T. J. Distortion or Development? Contending Per­spectives on the Multinational Corporations (London: MIT Press). 1978.,

Blomstrom, M. and Hettne, B., Development Theory in Transition: The Dependency Debate and Beyond, third World Responses (London:. Zed Books). 1984.

Bock, K. 'Theories of progress and evolution' in W. Cahnman and A. Boskoff (eds), Sociology and History: Theory and Research (New York: Free Press), (1964),. Bock, K. 'Theories of progress, development, evolution', in T.B. Bottomore and R. Nisbet, (eds), A History of Sociological Analysis (London: Heinemann), 1979.

141. Bradby, B. 'The destruction of natural economy", Economy and Society, vol. 4, 1975.

Brenner, R. 'The origins of capitalist development: a critique of neo-Smithian Marxism', New left Review, no. 104, July/August, 1977).

143. Brewer, A. Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A Critical Survey (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). 1980.

Cardoso. F. H. The consumption of dependency theory in the United States', Latin American Research Review, XII, (3).(1977..

145. Chambers. R. Normal professionalism, new paradigms and development', Discussion Paper, no. 227 (Sussex: Institute of Devel­opment Studies). 1986.

Coleman J. Resources for Social Change. N.Y. 1971.

Conlin, S., 'Anthropological advice in a Government context', in R, Grillo and A. Rew (eds), Social Anthropology and Development Policy (London and New York: Tavistock), 1985.

Cruise O'Brien, D. 'Modernization, order, and the erosion of a democratic ideal: American political science 1960-1970', in D. Lehmann (ed.), Development Theory: Four Critical Studies (London: Cass), 1979.

Dawe, A. 'The two sociologies', British Journal of Sociology, XII. (2), 1970.

Dawe, A. 'Theories of social action', in T.B. Bottomore and R. Nisbet (eds), A Histoiy of Sociological Analysis (London: Heinemann), 1979.

151. Dore, R. P. 'Underdevelopment in theoretical perspective', Dis­cussion Paper, no. 109 (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies). 1977.

Dos Santos, T. 'The structure of dependence', American Economic Review, 60, (2) 1970.

153. Dos Santos, T. 'The crisis of development theory and the problem of dependence in Latin America', in H. Bernstein (ed.), Underde­velopment and Development: The Third World Today, 2nd edition (Harmondsworth: Penguin), 1976.

Durkheim, E. The Division of labor in Society (New York: Free Press). 1964.

Durkheim, E. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology' and its Method, edited and with an Introduction by S. Lukes (London: Macmillan) 1982.

Eckberg, D. L, and Hill, L. 'The paradigm concept and sociology: a critical review', American Sociological Review, vol. 44, December, 1979.

157. Eisenstadt, S. N. Comparative Perspectives on Social Change (Boston. Mass.: Little, Brown & Co). 1968.

Eisenstadt, S. N. Modernization, Protest and Change (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall). 1966.

159. Eisenstadt, Schmuel N.(1999) “Multiple Modernities in an Age of Globalization, pp.37-50. in Grenzenlose Gesellschaft Teil 1. Opladen. Leske& Budrich.

Eisenstadt, S, N. (WO), Social change and development in S. N. Eisenstadt (ed.), Readings in Social Evolution and Development (Oxford: Pergamon), Emmanuel. A. Unequal Exchange: A Study in the Imperialism of Trade (New York and London: Monthly Review Press). 1972.

Emmanuel. A. Appropriate or Underdeveloped Technology (Chichester: John Wiley). 1982.

Erikson, E. H. Childhood and Society (New York: Norton). 1950.

163. Etzioni-Halevy E. Social Change: The Advent and Maturation of Modern Society (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).1981.

164. Evans-Pritchard, E. Essays in Social Anthropology (London: Faber& Faber). 1962.

165. Foster, G. Traditional Cultures and the Impact of Technological Change (New York: Harper & Row). (1962),

Foster, G. 'Peasant society and the image of limited good', American Anthropologist, vol. 67. 1965.

Foster-Carter. A. From Rostow to Guilder Frank: conflicting paradigms in the analysis of underdevelopment', World Development,4. (3), March, 1976.

168. Foster-Carter. A., 'Can we articulate articulation"?' in J. Clammer (ed), The New Economic Anthropology (London: Macmillan.1978.

Foster-Carter, A. 'Marxism versus dependency theory? A polemic', Occasional Papers, No. 8. University of Leeds. (1979),

Foster-Carter. A. Knowing what they mean: or why is there no phenomenology in the sociology of development?', in J. Clammer (ed.), Beyond the New Economic Anthropology (London: Macmillan), 1987.

Frank, A. G. Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution? (New York and London: Monthly Review Press). 1969.

172. Frank, A. G. Lumpenbourgeoisie: Lumpendevelopment - Depend­ence, Class and Politics in latin America (New York and London: Monthly Review Press). 1972.