Критерии оценивания государственного экзамена — КиберПедия 

Археология об основании Рима: Новые раскопки проясняют и такой острый дискуссионный вопрос, как дата самого возникновения Рима...

Биохимия спиртового брожения: Основу технологии получения пива составляет спиртовое брожение, - при котором сахар превращается...

Критерии оценивания государственного экзамена

2019-05-27 146
Критерии оценивания государственного экзамена 0.00 из 5.00 0 оценок
Заказать работу

 

Оценка по буквенной системе Цифровой эквивалент Баллы (%-ное содержание) Оценка по традиционной системе Критерии оценки знаний, умений, навыков и компетенций  
А 4 95-100

отлично

1.Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. 2. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic. 3. The written paper is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.
A- 3,67 90-94 1. Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. 2. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic. 3. The written paper is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.
B+ 3,33 85-89

хорошо

1. Writing is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present. 2. Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence. 3. The written paper has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly. Very few fragments or run-ons.
B 3,0 80-84 1. Writing is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present.
B- 2,67 75-79 2. Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence.
C+ 2,33 70-74 1. Writing is coherent and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout essay. 2. Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas. 3. Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar correct allowing reader to progress though essay. Some errors remain.
C 2,0 65-69

удовлетворительно

1. Writing is coherent and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout essay. 2. Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas. 3. Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar correct allowing reader to progress though essay. Some errors remain.
C- 1,67 60-64 1. Writing is coherent and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout essay. 2. Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas. 3. Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar correct allowing reader to progress though essay. Some errors remain.
D+ 1,33 55-59 1. Writing lacks logical organization. It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Serious errors. 2. Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal. 3. Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent.
D 1,0 50-54 1. Writing lacks logical organization. It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Serious errors. 2. Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal. 3. Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent.
0,5 25-49

неудовлетворительно

FX paper is a paper that is not scorable because • it does not respond to the type of writing the prompt is intended to elicit • it cannot be read because it is illegible • it consists of lists, notes, or drawings rather than sentences and paragraphs • the amount of writing is too minimal to be evaluated
F 0 0-24 F paper is a paper that is not scorable because • it does not respond to the type of writing the prompt is intended to elicit • it cannot be read because it is illegible • it consists of lists, notes, or drawings rather than sentences and paragraphs • the amount of writing is too minimal to be evaluated

 

 


Поделиться с друзьями:

Опора деревянной одностоечной и способы укрепление угловых опор: Опоры ВЛ - конструкции, предназначен­ные для поддерживания проводов на необходимой высоте над землей, водой...

Архитектура электронного правительства: Единая архитектура – это методологический подход при создании системы управления государства, который строится...

Индивидуальные очистные сооружения: К классу индивидуальных очистных сооружений относят сооружения, пропускная способность которых...

Состав сооружений: решетки и песколовки: Решетки – это первое устройство в схеме очистных сооружений. Они представляют...



© cyberpedia.su 2017-2024 - Не является автором материалов. Исключительное право сохранено за автором текста.
Если вы не хотите, чтобы данный материал был у нас на сайте, перейдите по ссылке: Нарушение авторских прав. Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

0.009 с.